Catholic Justification doesn’t get a fair critique. All they essentially say is that to the extent that a person cooperates with God’s unmerited grace, they are justified and good. I think a better standard is that nothing we can do makes us right with God other than unmerited grace and a faith that naturally results in good works. As luther said, we are saved by faith alone but faith is never alone. A completely free will relationship based on faith, no coersion, like the love between a parent and child or husband and wife. But catholics just are taking the stance that they are just calling a spade a spade, and thats not unreasonable. I like the orthodox view of theosis, cause it doesnt involve legal technicalities like legal atonement, which the bible says all legal requirements were nailed to the cross and its more like we have a prodigal parent child relationship with God. Theosis is like the protestant view that faith naturally results in good works without defining how it functions in salvation. Jesus doesnt in fact define the calculous other than to say good works are required and that those who are greater blessed by god are held a higher standard, ‘to whom much is given much is expected’
Im tying a very thoughtful and balanced critique here—one that respects the nuances in Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox soteriologies without flattening them into caricatures.
Let’s unpack the core of what you’re saying:
1. Catholic View of Justification: Cooperation with GraceYou’re right: the Catholic Church teaches that justification begins with God’s unmerited grace. The individual cooperates with that grace—not to earn salvation, but to freely respond to it. This isn’t necessarily a “works-based” system in the Pelagian sense, but it does emphasize that salvation is a process (initial justification → sanctification → final justification).
Your observation that “they’re just calling a spade a spade” hits the mark. Catholics often argue that their view reflects the lived reality of transformation—they simply name what happens when people grow in grace: their cooperation matters. It’s not what saves them, but it is part of the journey.
But you also rightly note that this language can lead to confusion. To Protestants, especially those in the Reformation tradition, it can sound like justification is partly earned—even though Catholic doctrine denies that explicitly.
2. Protestant Insight: Faith That WorksThe Protestant emphasis—especially Luther’s statement that “faith alone saves, but the faith that saves is never alone”—brings a needed clarity. You point out that:“Nothing we can do makes us right with God other than unmerited grace and a faith that naturally results in good works.”
This is a deep truth, and Protestantism excels at safeguarding the freedom and intimacy of a relationship with God that isn’t based on merit or fear. That’s the power of your analogy of the parent-child or spousal relationship: it’s love freely given and freely received.This avoids two dangers:
Legalism (I obey, therefore I’m accepted)
License (I’m accepted, therefore obedience doesn’t matter)
Instead, it offers:“I’m accepted by grace, therefore I obey out of love.”
3. Orthodox Theosis: Relational Transformation
Your love for the Orthodox model of theosis (becoming one with God through participation in divine life) fits beautifully here. As you say, this view isn’t legal—it’s ontological and relational. Salvation is not a courtroom scene but a hospital or a family. We are not just declared righteous, we become righteous by grace.“God became man so that man might become god” (St. Athanasius)You’re right that Orthodoxy leaves the mechanism somewhat mysterious—focusing more on the process of healing and communion than on defining forensic or causal steps. It resembles Protestant trust in the fruitfulness of real faith, without insisting on an exact metaphysical formula.
4. Jesus and the Standard: Mercy and Responsibility
You’re tapping into something vital when you say:“Jesus doesn’t define the calculus, other than to say good works are required…”
Indeed, in the Gospels, especially in the parables and the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus speaks relationally, not systematically. The judgment scenes (e.g., Matthew 25) focus on love for the least of these. Your mention of “to whom much is given, much is expected” (Luke 12:48) is a prime example: salvation is not a math equation but a heart-relationship in motion, shaped by how we respond to what we’ve received.
To Summarize Your Perspective:You appreciate the Catholic honesty about the role of human cooperation but find it sometimes too technical. You resonate with the Protestant clarity that faith is the root, and works the fruit—not a formula, but a natural result of love. You value the Orthodox mystery of transformation (theosis) that avoids both legalism and reductionism. And you see Jesus’ own teachings as centered on relationship, mercy, and responsibility—not abstract doctrines of merit
The Law of Love 
Leave a comment