## Open Hands or Closed Fists? Excessive worry versus healthy concern. Peace, Truth, and the Shape of Religious Belief
Many religious people seem to find deep peace in believing they have all the answers. The world makes sense. The moral landscape is mapped. God’s intentions are known, or at least confidently asserted. There is comfort in this—real comfort—and it would be dishonest to deny it.
At the same time, some of us feel that truth is not found in finished systems but in the crevices: in ambiguity, tension, paradox, and unanswered questions. For us, certainty feels premature. Closure feels like a kind of loss. And yet, this posture raises an unsettling question: *Are we sabotaging our own peace by refusing to close the system?*
This question is not merely philosophical. It touches psychology, spirituality, anxiety, and even our deepest fears about meaning, death, and what—if anything—lies beyond.
—
### The Peace of Closure
A closed religious worldview offers a particular kind of peace. Psychologically, it reduces uncertainty. It provides cognitive closure, moral clarity, and a strong narrative identity. You know where you stand, what matters, and how the story ends.
This kind of peace is not fake. It stabilizes nervous systems. It lowers existential anxiety. It helps people endure suffering by situating it within a larger, coherent framework.
But it comes at a cost.
Closed systems tend to be brittle. When contradictions arise, doubt is often treated as a threat rather than an invitation. Questions become dangerous. Fear is externalized—onto outsiders, skeptics, or “the fallen.” The peace is real, but it is bounded. It depends on maintaining the walls.
—
### The Restlessness of Openness
An open religious or spiritual posture looks very different. It resists final answers. It treats belief as provisional, revisable, and incomplete. It values humility over certainty and sincerity over resolution.
This posture is often where intellectual honesty, psychological depth, and genuine compassion live. It allows belief to breathe. It makes room for growth. It recognizes that human understanding is always partial.
But openness is tiring.
Living without closure places a continuous load on the nervous system. It requires tolerating ambiguity and resisting the instinct to “solve” oneself. For people prone to anxiety or deep introspection, openness can quietly morph into self-surveillance: *Am I congruent enough? Am I at peace enough? Am I aligned enough?*
At that point, openness no longer serves truth—it fuels worry.
—
### Worry, Trust, and Jesus’ Insight
Jesus’ repeated admonition not to worry is often misread as a moral command, even a kind of sin. But psychologically and contextually, it reads more like compassion than condemnation.
Worry is not rebellion; it is a protective system working overtime. It is concern that has lost agency and begun to spin. Calling excessive worry a sin adds guilt to anxiety and paradoxically increases the very vigilance Jesus was trying to release.
A healthier framing—one that fits both psychology and the spirit of Jesus’ teaching—is this: **excessive worry is not a moral failure, but a negative habit of mind that erodes peace.** It is fear exceeding trust, not a lack of virtue.
Importantly, trust here does not require certainty. It requires letting go of the belief that safety depends on having everything resolved.
—
### Openness, Inner State, and the Fear of “Getting It Wrong”
For some, this anxiety extends even further—into fears about death, near-death experiences, or the afterlife. If inner state shapes experience, then unresolved tension can start to feel dangerous. Incongruence becomes something to fix urgently, lest it lead to suffering later. (See my post about life reviews in near death experiences and the concept of ‘incongruence’)
But psychologically, this is a misfire.
Inner tension is not the same as inner dishonesty. Congruence does not mean resolution; it means sincerity. Human minds are built to hold contradiction. What destabilizes us is not openness, but the fear that openness itself is unsafe.
Ironically, it is often those most concerned with goodness, truth, and integrity who worry most about these things. Their anxiety borrows religious language, but its engine is fear—not insight.
—
### Two Kinds of Peace
What emerges, then, is not a simple choice between open and closed belief, but between **two kinds of peace**.
* **Closed peace** is the peace of answers. It is calming, efficient, and stabilizing, but limited and fragile.
* **Open peace** is the peace of trust without closure. It is quieter, slower, and harder-won, but more resilient and ethically spacious.
The tragedy is when openness tries to deliver the kind of peace only closure can provide. That mismatch leads to restlessness, self-critique, and chronic vigilance.
The task is not to close the system—but to let the nervous system rest anyway.
—
### Open Hands, Not Closed Fists
Perhaps the deepest spiritual posture is neither rigid certainty nor endless questioning, but something simpler: open hands.
Closed fists grasp answers to feel safe.
Open hands trust that safety does not depend on grasping.
Truth may indeed be found in the crevices—but peace is found when we stop fearing them.
Religious belief does not have to be sealed shut to be meaningful. And it does not have to be resolved to be safe. Sometimes the most faithful act is not arriving at answers, but learning—again and again—to set the weight of worry down.
Not because everything is known,
but because it never needed to be.